翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ New York City Serenade (film) ・ New York City Serenade (Once Upon a Time) ・ New York City Sheriff's Office ・ New York City steam system ・ New York City Subway ・ New York City Subway chaining ・ New York City Subway in popular culture ・ New York City Subway map ・ New York City Subway nomenclature ・ New York City Subway rolling stock ・ New York City Subway tiles ・ New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission ・ New York City teachers' strike of 1968 ・ New York City Teaching Fellows ・ New York City Transit Authority ・ New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer ・ New York City transit fares ・ New York City Transit Police ・ New York City Transit Strike ・ New York City Victory Parade of 1946 ・ New York City Vision Zero ・ New York City water supply system ・ New York City Water Tunnel No. 3 ・ New York City Waterfalls ・ New York Civic ・ New York Civil Liberties Union ・ New York Clan MacDonald ・ New York Classical Theatre ・ New York Clearing House ・ New York Clipper Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer ： ウィキペディア英語版 New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer ''New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer'', 440 U.S. 568 (1979), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the constitutionality of an employer's refusal to hire methadone users was upheld. ==Background== The New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) adopted a rule prohibiting the employment of anyone who used narcotic drugs. This rule was applied to persons using methadone, a drug used to treat heroin addiction. Two former NYCTA employees who had been fired while receiving methadone treatment and two applicants who were denied employment because of their use and past use of methadone sued the TA in federal district court. The court for the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and found the policy unconstitutional. While the district court enjoined the NYCTA from denying employment solely on the basis of past or current participation in a methadone maintenance program, it did authorize the transit authority to exclude methadone users from certain safety-related positions, as well as to condition employment on satisfactory performance in a methadone program for at least one year. This decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.